12. Intellectual
Property
Intellectual property rights (IPR) consider
creative work as a form of property and give the
owners of the creative work the right to use,
rent or sell some or all of their rights over
that property. Usually, IPR gives the creator an
exclusive right over the use of his/her creation
for a certain period of time. Intellectual
property rights can be divided into several
categories:
Copyright and rights related to copyright
Copyright is a form of property right attached
to an original work and which controls the right
to copy the work for a period lasting up to 70
years after the death of the author, depending
on the type of property being protected. A
“Work” can be a literary or artistic work
including books and other writings, musical
compositions, photographs, advertisements, maps,
catalogues, web page paintings, sculpture,
computer programs, films and certain databases.
Copyright encourages and rewards creative work
as it makes it unlawful to copy the results of
someone else’s efforts without their permission.
Related
(also called “neighbouring”) rights are granted
to certain well-defined categories of persons
who are involved in the business of musical or
audio-visual creation, such as performers (e.g.
actors, singers and musicians), producers of
phonograms (sound recordings), and producers of
first fixation of films, and broadcasting
organisations. The duration of related rights is
fifty years following the date of the
performance, the fixation, or after the first
transmission (for broadcasters). Throughout
Europe, copyright protection does not require
formal acts such as registration or copyright
note.
Case Study
E-Marketing Clinic is a small one-woman
operation offering consultancy services to
small and medium sized companies wanting to
market on the Internet. The company has a
comprehensive web site with downloadable
reports and guides to help people understand
and implement e-marketing. This information is
an effective tool for establishing the
credibility of E-Marketing Clinic. Indeed, the
company has been quite successful and Lisa,
the owner, has established a name for herself
in Internet marketing circles.
One
day, while using a search engine to look for
new information in her field, Lisa discovered
a link to a web site that appeared to be very
similar to hers. She visited the site and was
surprised to discover that someone had taken
all her material, claimed it as his own and
posted it on his web site.
Lisa
contacted her lawyer, who promptly issued a
“cease and desist” order to the plagiarist and
his ISP, and the copied web site disappeared
right away. Surprisingly, this has happened to
Lisa several times since and she now makes it
a regular habit to monitor search engines for
illegal copies of her web site and documents.
She also publishes a copyright notice on every
page of her web site. Strictly speaking, this
isn’t necessary. But it probably acts as a
deterrent to the casual plagiarist.
International Regulatory Framework and EU
Regulatory Framework coexist in the field of
copyright. The key international agreement is
the Berne Convention for the protection of
literary and artistic works that has been
ratified by more than 120 countries.
The
European Regulatory Framework provides
Directives on:
·
the legal protection of computer programs
·
the legal protection of databases
·
rental and lending rights and on certain
related rights
·
cable and satellite broadcasting
·
term of protection
The
European Council approved the directive ‘on the
harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright
and of related rights in the Information Society
deals both with legal and technical aspects’ on
April 9, 2001.
Member States must implement it latest by
December 22, 2002.
This
directive covers reproduction rights,
communication to the public rights, distribution
rights, and legal protection of anti-copying and
rights management systems. The proposal requires
that Member States continue to provide network
operators with an exception from the
reproduction right for certain technical acts of
reproduction (such “cache” copies which are
stored on Internet servers as users browse the
World Wide Web) and recognise that Member States
may provide rights-holders with fair
compensation for private copying by analogue as
well as digital means, in accordance with their
legal traditions and practices.
The
directive aims to adapt the existing European
framework on IPR to the on-line environment and
comply with international commitments. It
stimulates creativity and innovation by ensuring
that music, films and all materials protected by
copyright enjoy adequate protection throughout
the single market. It will facilitate
cross-border trade in copyright-protected goods
and services, with particular emphasis on new
electronic products and services (both on-line
and on physical carriers such as CDs).
In the
case of private copying, photocopying and
illustrations for teaching and scientific
research, the proposal specifies that right
holders must have access to fair compensation.
Protection of Databases
Copyright Protection
The
objective of the directive on the legal
protection of databases is to afford an
appropriate and uniform level of legal
protection of databases in any form, as a means
to secure the remuneration of the maker of the
database. It protects via copyright a database
which “by reason of the selection or
arrangement of their contents, constitute the
author’s own intellectual creation”. It does
not protect the contents of the database, which
may or may not be protected by copyright or
related rights, but the database itself.
The
directive excludes the protection of computer
programs used in the making or operation of
databases accessible by electronic means but
covers:
·
the legal protection of computer programs
·
rental right, lending right and certain
rights related to copyright in the field of
intellectual property
·
the term of protection of copyright and
certain related rights
The
protection expires 70 years after the death of
the author.
The New Economic Right
The
new economic right protects substantial
investment made in obtaining, verifying or
presenting the contents of the database. It
lasts for 25 years from 1 January of the year
following the completion of the database.
Industrial Property
Industrial property provides a monopoly right of
the exploitation of certain intellectual
creations:
Trademarks
Trademarks provide protection for signs, which
distinguish the goods or services of one
undertaking from those of other undertakings. In
most countries registration is necessary. There
is no time limit for the protection offered,
provided the appropriate formalities for renewal
of the registration are complied with.
Patents
Patents
are protected primarily to stimulate innovation
and creation of technology. The social purpose
is to provide protection for the results of
investment in the development of new technology,
thus giving innovators the incentive and means
to finance research and development. The
protection is usually given for a certain term,
typically 20 years. It should be noted that
United States patents are not recognised in the
European Union. Also, at the time of writing,
business models can be patented in the US, but
not in the EU.
Industrial designs
Industrial
designs provide protection for the shape or
appearance of a design that is industrially
exploited. Registration protects industrial
design for a limited time, generally 10 to 15
years.
Unfair competition
Competition law can provide
protection against a number of commercial
practices that involve the unlawful acquisition
of a company’s intellectual portfolio, such as
“know how” or trade secrets. Both EU and
national competition law apply and rules may
differ from one country to another. There is no
particular body of competition law that applies
to the Internet, so a new perspective is given
to established issues.
Domain Names
New and
specific trademark-related e-commerce problems
regarding Internet domain names are beginning to
occur and will doubtless star in upcoming legal
cases. Questions arise over the international
domains, particularly .com. What happens if a
company in one country acquires the .com for its
name (newcompany.com for instance) and a year
later another company from another country with
a trademark for the same name claims and wants
to register it? What happens if two companies,
from different countries and both holding
trademarks within their countries, have a
dispute over who holds the right to a particular
name? These issues have not yet been clarified,
but doubtless will be raised and clarified in
the courts in upcoming years, particularly as
new international top level domains, such as .eu,
are established.
What is
clear, following several landmark legal cases,
is that domain name squatting is illegal. Domain
name squatting is the act of acquiring a domain
name that obviously belongs to someone else,
either because the other party has a trademark
on the name or has clear ownership of the name (ie.
a celebrity or politician), with intent to sell
or lease the domain name to the rightful owner.
The .eu domain
The
growing scarcity of international top level
domains makes it more and more difficult to find
a short and attractive domain name. The .eu
domain is an initiative launched in February
2000 by the European Commission to create a new
top-level domain for European business. The
setting up of the .eu domain is part of the
‘eEurope Action Plan’ adopted by the European
Council. It will accelerate e-commerce in
Europe, give users a specific European
identification, avoid necessity of registration
in different Member States, and increase
consumer confidence in the use of the Internet.
Registration under. eu will be open to
organisations, companies and individuals of the
European Union.
In
December 2000 the European Commission adopted a
proposal for a Regulation on ‘the implementation
of the Internet Top Level Domain .eu’. The
proposal aims to create a single registry to
operate .eu. The registry would be a
not-for-profit organisation with registered
offices, central administration and principal
place of business in the European Union.
|